Dish of the day: breeding and mutating food species may be the only convincing plan anyone has for feeding the world Photograph: Victor de Schwanberg/Science Photo Library From Inside the meat lab: The future of food Could ethical concerns ultimately drive public acceptance of the new food technology? Cor van der Weele, Professor of Humanistic Philosophy at Wageningen University, is convinced that’s the case, with artificial meat at least. “People will see the moral benefits of cultured meats. Taking stem cells from a pig rather than killing millions of pigs in factories is already a more attractive idea to consumers.” She quotes studies of the viability of growing meat in sunlight-fuelled “bio-reactors” placed in desert areas: the reduction in resources is staggering. “It would require 1% of the land and just 2% of the water that traditional meat production does. And it would involve a 90% reduction in greenhouse gases,” she says. Eating real meat in 2035 could be as morally questionable as eating foie gras – and about as expensive. As Dr Mark Post says: “A meat-eater with a bicycle is much more environmentally unfriendly than a vegetarian with a Hummer.”

Dish of the day: breeding and mutating food species may be the only convincing plan anyone has for feeding the world Photograph: Victor de Schwanberg/Science Photo Library

From Inside the meat lab: The future of food

Could ethical concerns ultimately drive public acceptance of the new food technology? Cor van der Weele, Professor of Humanistic Philosophy at Wageningen University, is convinced that’s the case, with artificial meat at least. “People will see the moral benefits of cultured meats. Taking stem cells from a pig rather than killing millions of pigs in factories is already a more attractive idea to consumers.” She quotes studies of the viability of growing meat in sunlight-fuelled “bio-reactors” placed in desert areas: the reduction in resources is staggering. “It would require 1% of the land and just 2% of the water that traditional meat production does. And it would involve a 90% reduction in greenhouse gases,” she says.

Eating real meat in 2035 could be as morally questionable as eating foie gras – and about as expensive. As Dr Mark Post says: “A meat-eater with a bicycle is much more environmentally unfriendly than a vegetarian with a Hummer.”

Jan. 12 2013
Via Guardian
#science #news #food #biotech
372 notes

Notes

  1. dedtanisaucedo420 reblogged this from thenoobyorker and added:
    typograghy
  2. mollsfisher reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  3. ignatzpop reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  4. swirlyq reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  5. brightberry reblogged this from swindling
  6. swindling reblogged this from le-kif-kif
  7. opsi-poly-math reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  8. hrmzd reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  9. lamainsurlecoeur reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  10. birdmadboy reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  11. professorpizzaa reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  12. ninarose30 reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  13. kejacoby reblogged this from thenoobyorker
  14. southinthewinter reblogged this from operational-truth
  15. placitas reblogged this from climateadaptation
  16. operational-truth reblogged this from ligaturesignature
  17. ligaturesignature reblogged this from le-kif-kif
  18. indieminnie reblogged this from le-kif-kif
  19. kibibyte reblogged this from le-kif-kif
  20. le-kif-kif reblogged this from thenoobyorker