“For non-physicists, the importance of finding the Higgs belongs to the realm of understanding rather than utility. It adds to the sum of human knowledge—but it may never change lives as DNA or relativity have. Within 40 years, Einstein’s theories paved the way for the Manhattan Project and the scourge of nuclear weapons. The deciphering of DNA has led directly to many of the benefits of modern medicine and agriculture. The last really useful subatomic particle to be discovered, though, was the neutron in 1932. Particles found subsequently are too hard to make, and too short-lived to be useful.
This helps explain why, even at this moment of triumph, particle physics is a fragile endeavour. Gone are the days when physicists, having given politicians the atom bomb, strode confidently around the corridors of power. Today they are supplicants in a world where money is tight. The LHC, sustained by a consortium that was originally European but is now global, cost about $10 billion to build.
That is still a relatively small amount, though, to pay for knowing how things really work, and no form of science reaches deeper into reality than particle physics. As J.B.S. Haldane, a polymathic British scientist, once put it, the universe may be not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose. Yet given the chance, particle physicists will give it a run for its money.”
This helps explain why, even at this moment of triumph, particle physics is a fragile endeavour. Gone are the days when physicists, having given politicians the atom bomb, strode confidently around the corridors of power. Today they are supplicants in a world where money is tight. The LHC, sustained by a consortium that was originally European but is now global, cost about $10 billion to build.
That is still a relatively small amount, though, to pay for knowing how things really work, and no form of science reaches deeper into reality than particle physics. As J.B.S. Haldane, a polymathic British scientist, once put it, the universe may be not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose. Yet given the chance, particle physicists will give it a run for its money.”
—
This is pretty harsh. [The Economist]
The conversations that have sprung up are very interesting. Some are calling this an engineering feat and not one of science, others are trying to figure out who wins a Nobel Prize for this endeavor since it was a collaborative effort between thousands of scientists from hundreds of nations.
I just think it’s pretty cool anyway.
Notes
-
madamewesker likes this
-
stuffsmartppllike reblogged this from thenoobyorker
-
intheaether likes this
-
corroborate likes this
-
ridetherithum likes this
-
biognosis likes this
-
voteoprah reblogged this from thenoobyorker
-
littlejunibee likes this
-
luigimonstre likes this
-
neverendingmyth likes this
-
neuroticnewsjunkie likes this
-
armchair-existentialism reblogged this from trotskitty
-
trotskitty reblogged this from thenoobyorker
-
christinahicks reblogged this from thenoobyorker
-
theamericanbear likes this
-
milquetoastbrownie likes this
-
thenoobyorker posted this
